Australian Federal Government and State Governments failed to get a referendum passed to make AUSTRALIA a REPUBLIC THE PEOPLE SAID NO - - So the UN has been active in a push to get around the Constitution laws 1900 and then convert Australia into a REPUBLIC against the will of the people. Laws being enacted below to prepare for a secret UN takeover. This a letter you can use to alert the court.
SECTION 78B NOTIFICATION MADE IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 78B OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY ACT 1903 (COMMONWEALTH)
SEND TO EVERY STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL.
A writ of mandamus has been filed into the High Court of Australia today - and accepted - commanding the Federal Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia to cease all operations been carried out under the “Commonwealth of Australia” ABN 122 104 616 and registered with the Securities exchange commission No. 000 080 5157 and further dissolve subsidiary companies being: The State of New South Wales, The State of Victoria, ..Queensland, ...South Australia,...etc See below.
ALL AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENTS ARE A CARETAKER FOR THE UN; HERE'S THE REGO NUMBERS
In the December 8 the Mandamus writ the applicants demanded that the executive government of Australia ‘cease all operations that are carried out under the :
Commonwealth of Australia ABN 122 104 616 and registered with the:
United States American Securities and Exchange Commission No. 000 080 5157 and further command them to dissolve their subsidiary companies being;
The State of New South Wales ABN 066561153
The State of Victoria ABN 054558619
In Victoria the Justice Dept became : somewhat lost on the Victorian Government, where the Supreme Court has lately been reduced to "Business Unit 19" within the Department of Justice.
The State of Queensland ABN 066 102930
The State of South Australia ABN 050208921
The State of Western Australia ABN 072526008
The State of Tasmania ABN 053201308
The Trustees of Northern Territory Government ABN 09059854’
Basically the writ is giving the court 48 hours to respond and they have two choices 1) Issue the order - call in the military and shut down the parliament or 2) Civil War.
The line in the sand has been drawn.
Prerogative writs are a class of writs which originate from English law. Originally they were available only to the Crown, but later they were made available to the king's subjects through the courts.
Under the Australian legal system, mandamus is available through section 75(v) of the Australian Constitution.
In modern practice, the Court has effectively abolished the issuance of writs of mandamus, although it theoretically retains the power to issue them.
A writ of mandamus or mandamus (which means "we command" in Latin), or sometimes mandate, is the name of one of the prerogative writs in the common law, and is "issued by a superior court to compel a lower court or a government officer to perform mandatory or purely ministerial duties correctly".
Mandamus is a judicial remedy which is in the form of an order from a superior court to any government subordinate court, corporation or public authority to do or forbear from doing some specific act which that body is obliged under law to do or refrain from doing, as the case may be, and which is in the nature of public duty and in certain cases of a statutory duty. It cannot be issued to compel an authority to do something against statutory provision.
The purpose of mandamus is to remedy defects of justice. It lies in the cases where there is a specific right but no specific legal remedy for enforcing that right. It also lies in cases where there is an alternative remedy but the mode of redress is less convenient, less beneficial or less effectual
The applicant pleading for the writ of mandamus to be enforced should be able to show that he has a legal right to compel the respondent to do or refrain from doing the specific act. The duty sought to be enforced must have two qualities: It must be a duty of public nature and the duty must be imperative and should not be discretionary.
Mandamus, being a discretionary remedy, the application for that must be made in good faith and not for indirect purposes. Acquiescence cannot, however, bar the issue of mandamus. The petitioner must, of course, satisfy the Court that he has the legal right to the performance of the legal duty as distinct from mere discretion of authority. A mandamus is normally issued when an officer or an authority by compulsion of statute is required to perform a duty and which despite demand in writing has not been performed. In no other case will a writ of mandamus issue unless it be to quash an illegal order.
THE SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA NO LONGER MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER III OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION ACT 1900.
The State Government unlawfully created a monopoly called "The Department of the Attorney General" ABN 70 598 519 443
This monopoly company controls the Supreme Court of Western Australia, the District Court of Western Australia, the Magistrates Court of Western Australia , the State Solicitors office of Western Australia (previously known as the Crown Solicitors Office), the Department of Public Prosecutors, all Judges and Magistrates and all Lawyers as officers of the Courts.
The State Government of Western Australia is a company ABN: 66 012 878 629.
Both the State Government of Western Australia and the Department of the Attorney General of Western Australia are subsidiary companies of the Commonwealth of Australia registered as a corporation with the US Securities and Exchange Commission No: 0000 805 157
This establishes Western Australia as a corporate republic separate from the Commonwealth of Australia under the Federal Constitutional Act 1900.
That is an Act of High Treason against the Crown of England and an Act of Treason against the people of Australia.
The unlawful interpretation and application of S 51 SS 38 of the Federal Constitution in 1986 (the Australia Act) committed treason and fraud on the people of Australia. THIS ACT IS the beginning of our loss, it's the beginning of when we lost our freedom.
This is a report you should investigate:
by Sam Broad
The People's Mandate;
In 1999 (666 the beast) the electors, by Referendum, voted to keep the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution.
We would have ended up under a Dictatorship. It would have completed the Plan by the parties to have this massive control over the People.
The Australia Act 1986 was part of that plan.
On my web site there is a link to; Contempt of Constitution.
This set of files points out how the political parties have been in parliament
as if they are under the Constitution, when in fact, they are not under the Constitution.
I have said this before and I will repeat this again that we have never ever had a
government and parliament based on the Constitution all the way back to 1900.
And that the united nations is not a nation, not a country or has any sovereignty.
It is in my opinion; a self proclaimed "world government" a preconceived plan by
starting "wars" to further that plan.
A war is in effect "genecide" to reduce the number of people in any country and those who take part in the use of proclaiming "war" are all guilty of treason against the People.
My father who was part of the landing into europe said "I am fighting for king and country" When in fact he was fighting for king and the bankers.
So I do not care what you all say about this I am standing by the Constitution
to support the Constitution because it is the only thing I know of that is at present protecting us.
All the People of New Zealand, Tasmania and all of Australia support our Constitution.
If you want to hammer a nail into a piece of wood what tool would you use?
Would you use your fist? My guess, you would use a hammer.
The Constitution is the HAMMER. Your knowledge of the Constitution IS THE NAIL. The legislation and parliament IS THE WOOD.
Now, get with the Peoples Mandate and let us all set up our Government and Parliament.
The Draft of the Constitution and the Debt free money system is the way to go.
Parliament creates the money and from there it becomes a "bartering system".
We can buy our country back our manufacturing free Universary and schools no land or rates taxes free parking and travel on all the roads.
The trouble with most of you people you are so brain washed with banking.
And what they say on the TV that you can have no interest with what I am doing.
The People's Mandate;
Web address Political;
Australian Constitution Chapter One, Part IV. -- Both Houses of the Parliament.
Section 44 and Section 46;
44. Any person who--
(i. ) Is under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power,
or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or citizen of a foreign power:
(v. ) Has any direct or indirect pecuniary interest in any agreement with the Public Service of the Commonwealth otherwise than as a member and in common with the other members of an incorporated company consisting of more than twenty-five persons:
shall be incapable of being chosen or of sitting,
as a senator or a member of the House of Representatives.
46. Until the Parliament otherwise provides, any person declared by this Constitution to be incapable of sitting as a senator or as a member of the House of Representatives shall, for every day on which he so sits, be liable to pay the sum of one hundred pounds to any person who sues for it in any court of competent jurisdiction.
All political Parties and the United Nations are Non Government Organisations and as such would be the opposite to Section 44. (i. ) are under acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power by sending armed forces to Afghanistan and Iraq and;
What right has the Prime Minister to replace the Governor-General as the command in chief of the naval and military forces of the Commonwealth that is vested in the Governor-General as the
Queen's representative. Chapter 2. Section 68?
Section 44. (v. ) in common with the other members of an incorporated company consisting of more than twenty-five persons;
The Parliament of Australia has more than 150 persons.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Corporation) registered in the
UNITED STATES SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION as CIK (0000805157).
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
SIC: 8880 - American Depositary Receipts
State location: DC | Fiscal Year End: 0630
1601 MASSACHUSETTS AVE NW
C/O AUSTRALIAN EMBASSY
WASHINGTON DC 20036
NOTE; This is not the Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia, which is of one Electorate.
And there is no provision in the Constitution for any political parties.
The above Commonwealth of Australia Corporation was formed by the Political Parties. - Under the Crimes Act 1914 Part 2 Section 24AA. Sabotaging the Constitution is treachery.
Links to proof of information.
Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia
There is much trickery in the word usage itself.
A "Sovereign Nation" for instance really means a "nation-state" or "a corporate entity with sovereign powers" such as the two entities COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA [SEC filing in Washington DC in 1934 already].
From what I can gather it appears that the original system of the Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia [lasted only for a relatively short time period between 1900-1919, perhaps in original form] is still in existence to this very day, but laying largely dormant.
Then came the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CORPORATION at least as early as 1929 if not before, which has a SEC filing in Washington D.C. filed as early as 1934, a few years after the 1929 bankruptcy.
With it's PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH all of these, other than the original Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia, are what you call SOVEREIGN NATIONS which really means "Corporate or Nation-States with Sovereign Power i.e. operating in their own right as properly established corporations with the power to make rules for their corporation and those who are members of their corporations i.e. AUSTRALIAN CITIZENS.
It appears that Queen Elizabeth the Second [the true original Monarch] cannot not assent to legislation for the corporations known as COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA but her original Constitutional system is still in existence albeit laying dorment due to the fact that we are not operating according to the law in our financial affairs [i.e. we are NOT using Constitutional money of substance, the most critically important but least known or mentioned "condition" of the original Constitution] and due to the now non-existence of Constitutionally-approved money of substance as per the terms and conditions of original Constitution which in any case, was nothing more than a debt-repayment contract for debts of the country accrued between 1850-1900].
Put in another way, the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, under the Constitution is now a foreign entity to the corporations/nation-state/SOVEREIGN NATIONS known as COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA which belong to and essentially established by the IMF/UNITED NATIONS.
Therefore in our current PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH one cannot swear allegiance to a foreign entity - that is, the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, under the Constitution hereby established that is now an entity foreign to that corporation known as COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA, with a fictional "QUEEN OF AUSTRALIA" which is just a fictional title [no flesh and blood entity behind it].
So in reality the Constitutional protections and true protection of the law lay in one claiming to be a member of the original Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia whereby Queen Elizabeth the Second [the living flesh and blood monarch] still reigns albeit not currently operating or controlling the current "public offices" in any fiscal sense of the word, however, the original Constitutional protections and guaranteed rights under the original Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia are still in operation and still exist for they can only be removed by a referendum of, for and by the people.
"AUSTALIAN CITIZENS" are "corporate fictional persons" with no Constitutional rights as guaranteed in the original Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia and only have benefits and priveleges and a corporate charter known as the AUSTRALIA ACT 1986 - the real living flesh and blood people, of which you could count on one hand, still have the full protection and rights as guaranteed in the original Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia which still exists but is laying dormant in any operational sense.
To sum it up, Queen Elizabeth the Second, the true flesh and blood living Monarch, is still the executive power of the Commonwealth that is vested in the Queen of the original Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia, a venue and jurisdiction which although is still in existence for those who wish to protect and claim their lawful rights, is dormant in any controlling or financially operational sense when it comes to public offices. Such rights can only be involked "administratively" [private venue and jurisdiction]. AS soon as there is any controversy in any court cases today for instance, the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA is granted jurisdiction automatically to hear and adjudicate with absolute discretion in relation to such "controversy".
Over the top of the original Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia, came two successive CORPORATIONS known as NATION-STATES or SOVEREIGN NATIONS [a Nation is NOT a country so to speak] which belong to the UN and IMF and were lawfully imposed over the top of the Original Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia due to the bankruptcy/receivership of the Original Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia in 1929 with rearrangments and reconstructions of the debt repayment terms and conditions resulting in the AUSTRALIA ACT 1986 which is a CORPORATE CHARTER for the SOVEREIGN NATION [Corporate Nation-State] of AUSTRALIA.
In consideration of the fact that virtually ALL of the Constitutional entities in ALL of the western/Christian countries were bankrupted or went into receivership at the same time in 1929, it is also therefore possible that the STATUTE OF WESTMINSTER itself is nothing more than a corporate mirror-image, rather than an actual IMPERIAL act of British Parliament.
The term "AUSTRALIA" when used by the courts does not refer to the land mass country known as Australia but to the CORPORATION the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA established around 1929 unless specifically or impliedly stated otherwise. The AUSTRALIA ACT 1986 is the CORPORATE CHARTER for the corporation known as AUSTRALIA and AUSTRALIAN CITIZENS are PERSONS of which the Creator has no respect for, who only have benefits and priveleges and no Constitutional rights - this unfortunately is the absolute majority of the population.
So there appears to have taken place the following since 1900:
1. The Original Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia with Queen Elizabeth the Second, living flesh and blood reigning Monarch.
2. The Corporation known as COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA with a SEC filing in Washington DC filed in 1934. [A SOVEREIGN NATION WHICH DOES NOT MEAN A SOVEREIGN COUNTRY - it means a corporation or nation state with Sovereign power - eg, established by the creditor to whom the debts of the original Commonwealth of Australia were owed to - the IMF/UN/CROWN/International banksters ].
3. The Corporation known as AUSTRALIA established and incorporated in 1973 as a result of a secondary level of debt reconstruction and reorganization bringing with it subsidiary corporations such as PARLIAMENT OF AUSTRALIA and QUEEN OF AUSTRALIA and finally THE AUSTRALIA ACT 1986 [ the main Corporate charter].
Underlying the above numbers 2 and 3 is still in existence the original Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia and it's Constitution, with the original living flesh and blood Queen Elizabeth the Second as reigning Monarch to this very day which still protects those who choose not to be AUSTRALIAN CITIZENS, [members of the CORPORATION/SOVEREIGN NATION-STATE] those who recognize there is no money of substance in circulation anymore, and those who wish to access their exemption/prepaid account to discharge/setoff their debts in recognition of the fact that the funny money in circulation today cannot lawfully do so.
The actual protections of the law lie in the recognition of either and/or both:
1. That the living flesh and blood Queen Elizabeth the second is still our reigning Monarch for those who are NOT AUSTRALIAN CITIZENS with full Constitutional guarantees for those who wish to stand upon and claim such
2. The you are not an AUSTRALIAN CITIZEN PERSON fictional legal entity with only benefits and priveleges who must obey the corporate charter [AUSTRALIA ACT 1986] of the corporation known as AUSTRALIA.
Put another way the situation in Australia the land mass is as follows:
Private Venue and jurisdiction: The original Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia is still in full force and effect with Queen Elizabeth the Second still reigning over it, guaranteeing all rights to those who do not wish to be AUSTRALIAN CITIZEN PERSONS and make a cliam upon/use their exemption/prepaid account status. There is however no Constitutional money of substance to run the public offices in such a manner as originally intended but the protections of the law contained within the original Constitution nevetheless still exist.
Public Venue and Jurisiction: The IMF established and incorporated a corporation known as COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA [with a SEC Filing in Washington DC in 1934] at the bankruptcy/receivership of the original Constitutional Commonwealth of Austraia. AUSTRALIA was established and incorporated in 1973 as a secondary level consequence and reorganization of the 1929 bankruptcy whereby, AUSTRALIAN CITIZENS being PERSONS who are members of the CORPORATION OF AUSTRALIA with their CORPORATE CHARTER being the AUSTRALIA ACT 1986 who have only benefits and priveleges granted to them by the PARLIAMENT OF AUSTRALIA of which the living flesh and blood Queen Elizabeth the Second is now a foreign entity offering no Constitutional protections to such PERSONS.
The trickery has been in the use of words which resembled closely our original institutions, which such original institutions were replaced with corporations created, established and incorporated by the International Monetary Fund and it's many subsidiaries such as the CROWN, the UN, with the Vatican City ultimately controlling all of the above.
My Question of ACN; Is this the reason for the introduction of GST taxation system?
The banking ombudsman is really a series of interloping inter meddling interfering impostors (agents)
ACN 050 070 034 REGD * THE AUSTRALIAN BANKING INDUSTRY OMBUDSMAN LTD
ACN 050 070 034 REGD BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES OMBUDSMAN LIMITED
ACN 114 322 468 REGD FINANCIAL OMBUDSMAN SERVICE PTY LTD
ACN 006 354 089 REGD BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES LAW ASSOCIATION LTD.
ACN 104 961 882 REGD * MORTGAGE INDUSTRY OMBUDSMAN SERVICE LIMITED
ACN 104 961 882 REGD CREDIT OMBUDSMAN SERVICE LIMITED
ACN 117 680 172 REGD INDEPENDENT OMBUDSMAN SERVICE PTY LTD
NSW D0810222 RMVD MR OMBUDSMAN
059240130 NRGD OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN
and are another useless piece of bureaucratic deception in supposedly helping REAL flesh & blood human beings. They are their to deal with FICTIONS (corporations - your strawman) such as FRANCES SMALLBONE but not Frances Smallbone who is the real flesh & blood human being.
The internationalised banksters (globalised corporation) controls the commonwealth (corporate) government of Australia and this corporation controls all federal, state & local government depts. & public servants (all corporations) and the law (another series of corporations).
In a case like ours the real human being ombudsman (a legal FICTION) contracted to the corporation within a myriad series of corporations is completely out of his/her REAL depth and if he/she tried anything REAL outside their corporate jurisdiction (FICTION), you can kiss good bye to their career
and long term security etc.
Corporations are the internationalised shadow government who have usurped all sovereign constitutional enactment's & systems through their statutes.
Magna Carta, The Bill Of Rights etc. are abolished.
We no longer have legal rights and the judges know & enforce this!
We are now governed by CORPORATION STATUTES. Did we have a referendum to allow this? or were we all tricked and deceived? This is why trial by jury is almost completely wiped out. Common Law is literally kaput.
Something I noticed today for the very first time was near the very bottom of the Daily court lists for the Supreme Court of NSW. I have cut & pasted this here (see color blue)
. Thanks sam
An important message to all. Thanks James Dean.
Concerning the Australia Act 1986 which the Electorate did not vote to enact. This Act impinges on our Cwth Constitution and therefore is invalid. This message must to all the political representatives and hopefully local Councilors will then finally realise that the Local Government Act 1995 turns them all into "nodding-dog seat-warmers" where all the authority is given to their staff via the Local Government Act 1995 who have no responsibility (See Joondalup Council of old. It was the Councilors that took the flack, not the cocooned staff) and turns the Local Councilor Representatives of the people into having all the responsibility but none of the authority; the same applies to State and Federal Electorate representatives done by the stealth of the civil service which it in turn is controlled from outside of Australia.
See links" "Western Australia Consolidated Acts and Regulations
This link is the full WA Criminal Code. you will see
[Index] [Table] [Search] [Search this Act] [Notes] [Noteup] [Download] [Help]
Just click on "Search this Act" and type in any key word below 'Enter search query' such as 'Sedition', look for two green arrows before and after 'Sedition' and this will tell you which section of the Act your catch-word relates to.
As a matter of interest the 1986 Australia Act is unconstitutional as it seeks to remove the Crown, the Crown cannot be removed because it is the democratic position of our collective freedom as a nation engendered within the 1215 Magna Charta and our Commonwealth Constitution 1900 here in our common wealth land of Australia; all Commonwealth countries are the same ... Canada, Britain and so-forth, they are all owned by the people, that is why they are called a Common Wealth.
The WA Constitution 1889 was brought in when WA was a Colony not a State. The WA 1889 Constitution, where it remained in unison with the Cwth Constitution 1900, is valid because s.106 of the Cwth Constitution 1900 says it can continue but subject to the Cwth Constitution 1900. So quite plainly s.52, 53 and 64 to identify but tree sections of the WA Constitution 1889 became Cwth Constitutionally invalid in the year 1900. As s.52 & 53 of the WA Constitution 1889 are the only sections that grant the existence of Local Government, Local Government needed another law to give it credence. Unfortunately the Australia Act 1986 and the Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 (WA) both impinge on the Cwth Constitution 1900 by seeking to remove the Crown. Local Government (Not Councilors) are on legal thin ice and they have known this for some 111 years; the pity will be if our Local Councilors go down with the already sinking ship of Local Governments but unfortunately Councilors generally have no idea.
Regarding 'International Law' the Electorate never had a referendum to hand over any power to the U.N. or to agree to any international law. We have our own Human Rights Act and the like. So these 'Treaties, 'Conventions' and 'international covenants are not lawful because the Federal and State Governments of the day did not have a mandate from the people to sign any such 'Treaties, 'Conventions' and 'international covenants.
Our representatives of the people are placed in their positions and removed by the 'Power' of the people, the same 'Power' these 'Treaties, 'Conventions' and 'international covenants are designed by stealth to remove. Our representatives are placed in positions or responsibility to maintain the laws we the people vote for, we certainly did not vote to allow our representatives to sign these 'Treaties', 'Conventions' and 'international covenants without following the Commonwealth Constitutional enactment process outline (In the law by which all State and Federal laws are subject too) which is the Commonwealth or Australia Constitution Act 1900 and in s.128 of the said Commonwealth Constitution the enactment process is outlined.
Any politician who says that s.128 is only to amend the Commonwealth Constitution is a fool not to see that ALL law is subject to the Commonwealth Constitution (See s.15A Acts Interpretations Act 1901) in much the same way that the Electorate of Western Australia did not give a mandate to the Western Australian Government of the day to impose the Local Government Act onto the Electorates local Councilors to control and indirectly "Land Tax" our Freehold homes in the form of local 'Rates' under the Commonwealth Constitutionally inconsistent s. 52&53 of the WA Constitution 1889. In fact the Electorate of Australia and Western Australia give a clear 'NO' to Local Government Act 1995 imposition onto our local Councils using the unconstitutional Australia Act 1986. Under our democratic rights any group of people can elect a local representative. However, that representative is not given 'POWER' to 'RULE' they, the 'POWER' and 'RULE' always remains with the people. What our political representative were given when elected was responsibility to maintain the laws which the people pass by popular vote and should they seek to bring in a law such as the Australia Act 1986 which impinges on our Commonwealth Constitution then it is inconsistent under s.109 of the Cwth Constitution and therefore invalid.
Very few of our political representatives understand our democratic process or even have a grasp of the 800 years of democratic history which supports our common wealth land we the people own collectively which is the Common-wealth of Australia. The Crown is owned by the people in perpetuity. Queen Elizabeth II wears our Crown under oath to maintain the Protestant Christian faith of the Church of England, whose Bible is the 1611 Kings James Bible (Bishops Bible) and to uphold our laws (the greater being the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900 by which all other laws in the common wealth of Australia are subject too.)
Test all laws to ensure that it has undergone the correct enactment process, any law (State or Federal) which impinges on our Commonwealth Constitution cannot be passed by Parliament under s.51 of the Cwth. Constitution which both the Australia Act 1986 (Fed) and the Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 (WA) does. To remove the Crown bearing Queen Elizabeth II removes the Crown of power from the Electorate and therefore the only thing left is a despotic system under the guise of a REPUBLIC.............................. Why do you think the UN and NWO and Labour Representatives want to get rid of the Cwth. Constitution? Its the power and ownership of Australia by the people for the people. The way things have emerged over the last 20 years, our Governments have become ONLY caretakers for the UN and NWO and Bankers.
US and UN NATO TAKE HAARP DATA OFF THE NET.
Updated April 21, 2011 – The HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) website has been down for the past 3 weeks. It was ordered taken down by the US government to conceal US weather modification and earthquake inducing warfare activities against foreign states. The HAARP website was publishing very damaging evidence of US military weather modification and earthquake triggering operations against foreign states. HAARP’s waterfall charts and magnetometer charts gave evidence of an ongoing weather war between the United States government and foreign states. The magnetometer presented concrete evidence that HAARP triggered the Japan earthquake and ensuing tsunami.
HAARP’s magnetometer can be used to predict as well as give evidence of a HAARP created earthquake. A magnetometer measures disturbances in the magnetic field in Earth’s upper atmosphere. HAARP was broadcasting a 2.5 Hz frequency (the signature frequency of an earthquake) from just before midnight on March 8, 2011 and continued to broadcast the frequency for the entire days of March 9, 2011 and March 10, 2011. The 2.5 Hz frequency continued to be broadcasted and recorded by the magnetometer for another 10 hours the day of the Japan 9.0 magnitude earthquake.
Scientists at the HAARP institute discovered that a 2.5 Hz radio frequency is the signature frequency of an earthquake. Since this discovery the HAARP phased array antennas have been used by the US military to beam the earthquake frequency into the ionosphere and the ionosphere reflects it back to Earth – penetrating as deeply as several kilometers into the ground, depending on the geological makeup and subsurface water conditions in a targeted area.. By beaming the frequency at a specific trajectory HAARP can trigger an earthquake any place on Earth. A short burst isn’t enough to disturb solid matter (the Earth crust) so they keep beaming the 2.5 Hz earthquake frequency for hours or days – until the desired effect is achieved.
The Environmental Modification Convention (ENMOD) prohibits the military or other hostile use of environmental modification techniques. It opened for signature on 18 May 1977 in Geneva and entered into force on 5 October 1978. The Convention bans weather warfare, which is the use of weather modification techniques for the purposes of inducing damage or destruction.
Evidence from HAARP’s own website revealed that the US government was acting in violation of the ENMOD treaty – use of weather modification techniques (HAARP) for the purposes of inducing damage or destruction. HAARP broadcasting data published on the HAARP website coincided with a number of recent major catastrophes such as the 2010 Haiti earthquake, the 2010 heatwave in Russia, the major floorings in 2010 in China and Pakistan and the major earthquakes in Haiti and Japan – all occurred since US president and commander-in-chief of the United States military Barack Hussein Obama took office.
The Japan 9.0 earthquake offered the most damaging evidence of the US government using HAARP to induce major damage and destruction against a foreign state. HAARP’s magnetometer data showed the World that HAARP (jointly managed by the US Air Force and the US Navy) began broadcasting the earthquake inducing frequency of 2.5 Hz on March 8, 2011 and continued to broadcast the frequency for the entire days of March 9, 2011 and March 10, 2011. HAARP wasn’t turned off until 10 hours after the Japan 9.0 magnitude earthquake that was triggered on Friday, March 11, 2011 at 05:46:23 UTC. Smaller earthquakes have continued for weeks without being registered on the HAARP magnetometer. Why? Because, as stated before a magnetometer measures disturbances in the magnetic field in Earth’s upper atmosphere. It is not a seismometer which measure motions of the ground. The magnetometer doesn’t measure seismic activity it measures and records electromagnetic frequencies in the Earth’s atmosphere. HAARP’s antenna array beams the 2.5 Hz earthquake inducing radio frequency into the atmosphere where a magnetometer can record and provide concrete evidence of a US weather modification and earthquake triggering attack against foreign states.
WHEN THOUSANDS OF COMPLAINTS ARE DIRECTED TO GOVERNMENTS ABOUT H.A.A.R.P the public are told it does'nt exist, its a 'conspiracy'.
CHECK OUT THE PATENTS FOR YOURSELF
HAARP Patents (Assigned to APTI, Inc. Los Angeles, CA, Washington, DC)
U.S. Patent 4686605: Method And Apparatus For Altering A Region In The Earth’s Atmosphere, Ionosphere, And/Or Magnetosphere Issued: Aug. 11, 1987 Filed: Jan. 10, 1985
U.S. Patent 5038664: Method For Producing A Shell Of Relativistic Particles At An Altitude Above The Earth’s Surface ~ Issued: Aug. 13, 1991 Filed: Jan. 10, 1985
U.S. Patent 4712155: Method And Apparatus For Creating An Artificial Electron Cyclotron Heating Region Of Plasma ~ Issued: Dec. 8, 1987 Filed: Jan. 28, 1985
U.S. Patent 5068669: Power Beaming System ~ Issued: Nov. 26, 1991 Filed: Sep. 1, 1988
U.S. Patent 5218374: Power Beaming System With Printer Circuit Radiating Elements Having Resonating Cavities ~ Issued: June 8, 1993 Filed: Oct. 10, 1989
U.S. Patent 5293176: Folded Cross Grid Dipole Antenna Element ~ Issued: Mar. 8, 1994 Filed: Nov. 18, 1991
U.S. Patent 5202689: Lightweight Focusing Reflector For Space ~ Issued: Apr. 13, 1993 Filed: Aug. 23, 1991
U.S. Patent 5041834: Artificial Ionospheric Mirror Composed Of A Plasma Layer Which Can Be Tilted ~ Issued: Aug. 20, 1991 Filed: May. 17, 1990
U.S. Patent 4999637: Creation Of Artificial Ionization Clouds Above The Earth ~ Issued: Mar. 12, 1991 Filed: May. 14, 1987
U.S. Patent 4954709: High Resolution Directional Gamma Ray Detector ~ Issued: Sep. 4, 1990 Filed: Aug. 16, 1989
U.S. Patent 4817495: Defense System For Discriminating Between Objects In Space ~ Issued: Apr. 4, 1989 Filed: Jul. 7, 1986
U.S. Patent 4873928: Nuclear-Sized Explosions Without Radiation ~ Issued: Oct. 17, 1989 Filed: June 15, 1987
Still think that HAARP is just another wacky fictional conspiracy? The above listed patents should be enough to convince any intelligent person that HAARP is real and is now actively modifying our weather and triggering earthquakes. For those who are still not convinced, look to the United States Congress for proof. In order for HAARP to get funding the people who first created HAARP needed funding. That funding was made possible by the US government. If you were to look at Congressional records you would find documents that states just one of the many official purposes of HAARP – for penetrating the earth with signals bounced off of the ionosphere. Congress was informed by people in the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program that the bounced signals would be used to look inside the planet to a depth of many kilometers in order to locate underground munitions, minerals and tunnels. If you bounced the known earthquake signature signal (2.5 Hz) for a sustained period of time an earthquake could triggered many kilometers inside Earth’s crust. The U.S. Senate actually set aside $15 million dollars in 1996 (Clinton and Al Gore Administration) to develop this ability alone — earth-penetrating-tomography.
Update April 21, 2011
Under pressure from the International community the HAARP website is up again. No data is available from April 7 to April 12, 2011. Data before and after shows the signature frequency of an earthquake (2.5Hz) being transmitted. Also shows energy spikes which indicates active weather modification. Now that the website is up again you can view the data for the Japan earthquake at http://126.96.36.199/cgi-bin/scmag/disp-scmag.cgi?20110311. From the magnetometer induction data you can see 2.5Hz (earthquake inducing frequency) being broadcasted and recorded for several days before the 9.0 magnitude earthquake. To see what a normal (no HAARP broadcasting) day looks like view the magnetometer charts for the days of March 15, 16 and 17 – March 16, 2011 http://188.8.131.52/cgi-bin/scmag/disp-scmag.cgi?date=20110316&Bx=on. No earthquake inducing broadcast was detected from March 15 to March 27, 2011. On March 28, 2011 a low powered broadcast was detected from approximately 12:00 am to 3:00 am. Broadcasting resumed on April 2, 2011. April 6, 2011 shows you what the magnetometer charts looks like when a solar storm blasts Earth. No data is available from April 7, 2011 to April 13, 2011 – a shutdown. Starting on April 15, 2011 and ending approximately 10:00 am April 16, 2011 the earthquake inducing frequency of 2.5Hz was detected being broadcasted.
Weather Modification - In other words, the UN and NWO under the control of the Banking Cartel are producing their OWN man-made form of "CLIMATE CHANGE' to dupe the world governments into providing the 'CARBON TAX' which they need to fund their 'One world Global Government with an army, security forces, and administration. They started off calling it "Global warming' but AS the world is actually in a global cooling, they now refer to it as 'Climate Change'. AND THE SERIOUS DAMAGE IS TO OUR ECO SYSTEM, WILD LIFE, AND BEES ARE DESTROYED as the natural global 'electro-magnetic' field needed by bees and birds for navigation is disturbed by HAARP.
AS The HAARP program has been taken over by UN USA NWO National security under the BANKING CARTEL CONTROL, no Gov' or MEDIA will inform the public of its dangers and potency as a secret WEAPON of 'MASS DESTRUCTION'.
ILLEGAL TO COLLECT PAYMENTS FOR TOLLWAY
SPER (State Payments Enforcement Registry of Queensland)
115 States not to coin money
A State shall not coin money, nor make anything but gold and silver coin a legal tender in payment of debts.
This section is what is known constitutionally as an “express prohibition”. In other words the States are expressly prohibited from making anything other than gold and silver coin a legal tender in payment of debts. A State cannot substitute anything for payment of a debt, such as property or assets of any kind, nor can a period of imprisonment be substituted for non-payment. State courts may find liability but cannot order other than gold and silver coin be paid to extinguish debt. This was confirmed to me recently in the Queensland Supreme Court when Justice Ros Atkinson, when I asked her how costs could be paid considering Section 115 of the Commonwealth Constitution, said, “I won’t go into that, it is up to you”. I then said “Thank you your Honour, that means they can’t be paid”. Crown Law has not sent me a bill since that time as they know full well they cannot collect what is not available. As there are no gold and silver coins in common circulation it is not possible for a State to make any person pay debts to a State, or to any person in a State, as this would breach Section 115. Conversely, not being able to compel any person to accept other than gold and silver coin, a State is prohibited from demanding other than gold and silver coin.